Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Institute for National Strategic Studies
National Defense University
INSS
Toggle navigation
Home
About
Events
Internships
Visiting Fellows Program
Experts
Publications
Insights
Policy Briefs
Occasional Papers
Case Studies
Books & Book Chapters
Contact
Search
Search the INSS site:
Search
Browse by
INSS Around the Web
Publication Type
Strategic Insights
Policy Briefs
Strategic Forums
Defense Horizons
WMD Proceedings
Occasional Papers
INSS Strategic Perspectives
China Strategic Perspectives
WMD Occasional Papers
Journals
Joint Force Quarterly
PRISM
Case Studies
Event Reports
Books & Book Chapters
Topics
Defense Strategy & Policy
Ethics & Leadership
Emerging Science & Technology
Energy & Economics
Chinese Military
Counterproliferation & WMD
Transatlantic Security
Irregular & Hybrid Conflict
Regions
Asia and the Pacific
Europe
Latin America and the Caribbean
Middle East and North Africa
Russia and Eurasia
Ukraine
Sub-Saharan Africa
Archive
Publications
News
| Nov. 28, 2016
China’s Future SSBN Command and Control Structure
By David C. Logan
Strategic Forum 299
DOWNLOAD PDF
Key Points
China is developing its first credible sea-based nuclear forces. This emergent nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) force will pose unique challenges to a country that has favored tightly centralized control over its nuclear deterrent. The choices China makes about SSBN command and control will have important implications for strategic stability.
Despite claims that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force will be responsible for all Chinese nuclear forces, Chinese SSBNs currently appear to be under the control of the PLA Navy. However, China may choose to revise its command and control structures as its SSBNs begin armed deterrent patrols. There are three broad command and control models, allocating varying degrees of authority to the PLA Navy or the Rocket Force.
China’s decisions about SSBN command and control will be mediated by operational, bureaucratic, and political considerations. A hybrid approach to command and control, with authority divided between the navy and the Rocket Force, would be most conducive to supporting strategic stability.
READ MORE >>
SHARE
PRINT