INSS Research Fellows and Faculty stand next to a group of researchers from Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) and s group of Japan Self-Defense Force (JSDF) officers from NIDS’ National Security Strategist Studies Program  at National Defense University (NDU).
INSS Hosts Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies
On 2 June, INSS hosted researchers from Japan's National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) and a group of Japan Self-Defense Force (JSDF) officers for a research dialogue and discussion on the US-Japan alliance and strategic and security affairs in the Indo-Pacific.
National Defense University hosted a delegation from the NATO Defense College’s Senior Officer Course for discussions on major security challenges shaping the transatlantic and global strategic environment. INSS facilitated panel discussions, including "U.S. National Defense Strategy and its Implications for NATO and Europe." Speakers are pictured left to right: Dr. David Auerswald, Professor, National War College, NDU; Dr. Justin Anderson, Senior Fellow, INSS, NDU; Dr. Lisa A. Aronsson, Research Fellow, Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS), NDU (Moderator); and Dr. Elena Pokalova, Professor, College of International Security Affairs (CISA), NDU.
INSS Facilitates Discussions During NATO Defense College Visit
INSS joined NDU colleagues for discussions on U.S. national defense priorities, Indo-Pacific security, and global security challenges.
On 13 March, INSS led a timely, regional security discussion with Dr. Mahsa Rouhi on Operation Epic Fury.
NDU President VAMD Peter Garvin and Dr. Robert Kadlec, Assistant Secretary of War for Nuclear Deterrence, Chemical, and Biological Defense, Policy and Programs
Framework for Biological Weapons Deterrence: Report Rollout Event
On 12 March, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the National Defense University (NDU) co-hosted the Framework for Biological Weapons Deterrence: Report Rollout event.

Highlighted Articles

An image of a brain with a target on top. By engaging the tools and techniques of the neurosciences, contemporary and near future approaches to cognitive warfare increasingly target key structures and functions of the human brain to affect thought, emotions and behaviors, essentially establishing the brain and mind as a viable and valuable battlespace.

Cognitive Warfare and the Brain-as-Battlespace: Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and the Emerging Domain of Neurostrategic Competition

Dr. James Giordano and Dr. Robert Schmidle

Introduction: The Human Brain as BattlespaceEvery competitive or conflictive human activity wields

The autonomous system, Origin, prepares for a practice run during the Project Convergence capstone event at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, Aug. 11–Sept. 18, 2020. Project Convergence is the Army’s campaign of learning to aggressively advance solutions in the areas of people, weapons systems, command and control, information, and terrain; and integrate the Army’s contributions to Joint All Domain Operations.

AI Versus AI: Human Engagement Via SYNTHComm in AI Warfare

Dr. Elise Annett and Dr. James Giordano

In the AAIRR journal, INSS experts Dr. Elise G. Annett and Dr. James Giordano propose and define a dialectical command framework that represents a synthesis of human cognition and artificial intelligence (SYNTHComm), which is designed to realign the ethics of force projection in an era of increasingly autonomous systems.

A street sign depicting OODA Loop sits on display February 3, 2020, at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. The looping street is a play on the acronym for which it's named: Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. These steps are performed in a loop to determine courses of action. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Quay Drawdy)

Decision Advantage in Cognitive Warfare, Part 2

John Murray, Dr. Elise Annett, and Dr. James Giordano

A central challenge of cognitive warfare is governing the relationship between institutional cognition and an operational environment in which informational, behavioral, and social dynamics evolve continuously and often independently of military decision timelines. To meet this challenge, we propose that future command architectures should emphasize and integrate mechanisms for the adaptive synchronization of human judgment, AI, and the cognitive ecosystem being engaged.

A street sign depicting OODA Loop sits on display February 3, 2020, at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. The looping street is a play on the acronym for which it's named: Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. These steps are performed in a loop to determine courses of action. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Quay Drawdy)

Decision Advantage in Cognitive Warfare, Part 1

John Murray, Dr. Elise Annett, and Dr. James Giordano

The functions of observation and orientation, central components of the OODA (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) loop posited by Colonel John Boyd, U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, military strategist, and influential theorist of decision-making, have long been used to explain the cognitive processes that underpin military leadership and operational effectiveness.

Research & Analysis